But they clearly wanted to trick us until thinking he was dead so who's to say they're not trying to trick us again? Fool me once, shame on you. If Doug's eyes had been closed? Then, sure. ![]() In Season 3, they tried to make it out like Doug's fate at the end of Season 2 had been ambiguous but there's nothing ambiguous about the image of a man lying completely immobile with his eyes open, unblinking. It's not like this would be the first time, either. There's always the chance that the writers are trying to execute a big switcheroo. But in the meantime, let's consider the possibilities: Doug Didn't Kill Rachel again? Since House Of Cards was officially renewed for Season 4, we know we'll get a definitive answer one way or another next year. Regardless of which side of the debate you come down on, the question has to be asked: Did Doug really kill Rachel? Or are the writers just trying to mislead their audience. And it undermines the suspense, because you assume the next big threat he faces will just be disposed of too. If someone gets too close to destroying him, Frank just has him/her killed. But it also frustrated me because I feel like the three biggest threats to Frank’s career - Peter, Zoe and now Rachel - have all been murdered. All he wanted was to get back to where he’d been - a return to a dark Eden lorded over by forked-tongued Frank - and he gets his wish, but the final episode feels like a point of no return for this character.īut just as many - if not more - viewers decried Doug's assassination of Rachel as frustrating, upsetting, or both, including TVLine's Michael Ausiello, who "was not happy about Rachel getting killed off": I loved that character, and I felt like it added a lot of heart to the show. The injury changed Doug in the worst way, burning away whatever remained of this chilly political fixer’s conscience. The pain that he suffered launched him down a rough road. ![]() Some viewers enjoyed Doug's storyline, including Vulture's Matt Zoller Seitz, who lauded the show for " subvert the typical trauma narrative": Doug’s story is atypical only because it ends (or pauses) on such a dour note. To say that this plot twist was controversial is an understatement. ![]() In the Season 3 finale, the tables were turned when Doug finally caught up to Rachel after 13 episodes of searching for the missing woman, drove her into the desert, killed her, and buried her unceremoniously in a shallow grave. Rachel had hit the man in the head with a rock when she thought he was going to kill her, and left him for dead in the woods. Let's take a look back, for starters: The third season premiere of Netflix's political drama shocked viewers by revealing that Doug Stamper, President Underwood's Chief of Staff, was alive and, if not well, then at least on the road to recovery, after having seemingly perished at the end of Season 2. But is it possible that Doug didn't really kill Rachel? Then let's talk about the controversial end to Doug's Season 3 journey namely Doug's decision to kill Rachel Posner in cold blood. I'm gonna go ahead and warn you right now: If for some reason you haven't yet watched the entirety of House Of Cards Season 3 - and you intend to at some point - then turn away now, since we'll be discussing some extremely spoilery stuff here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |